November 28, 2020

Sidney Powell Flag of United States⭐⭐⭐ Retweeted

Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
1) I’ve finished reviewing the Georgia filing and I have a few comments to share with the socialverse in my capacity as a 30-year registered Democrat, former Oregon state elections official (with policy and admin experience), and former CIO.
7:36 PM · Nov 26, 2020·Twitter Web App
8.8K
Retweets
2.5K
Quote Tweets
18.8K
Likes
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
Replying to
@visionfarm
2/12 I will not comment on the legal claims because, while I have familiarity with the law and court filings, I’m not a lawyer. I am also going to mostly stay away from alleged behaviors, too, as I wasn’t there and, anyway, they add color but are more open to dispute …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
3/12 Technology 1/2: The original intent of the software code (acc’d to affidavits) was to manipulate votes without detection. When you start with one goal in mind, it’s tough to pivot to the opposite goal later—not matter how hard you might try. Not that it seems anyone tried …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
4/12 Tech 2/2: Absence of secure audit log (to record every action in the software) is so indefensible that I LOL’d when I read it. This fact alone should be enough to negate the results when there is ANY question about fraud because it cannot be proven that fraud DIDN’T occur …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
5/12 Elections administration. Lawsuit alleges that many procedures required in state law—for good, common sense reasons to ensure the one voter, one ballot rule is adhered to—were not followed, including …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
6/12 Receipt of absentee ballots in their return envelopes was not recorded (this reduces risk of ballot box stuffing, i.e., to ensure that only one real ballot has been submitted by one real voter) …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
7/12 Signatures were not verified against voter registration on return envelopes (same reason as 6, above). There might be missing envelopes, too; it wasn’t clear to me in my reading or I missed it …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
8/12 Ballot processing is not allowed before Election Day in Georgia (this varies by state); in this election, by rule inconsistent with state law, SecState allowed counties to start 3 weeks early. Absent a rigid accountability processes, this risks …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
9/12 … double or counterfeit voting. Conducting one election with INTEGRITY is hard enough; when you overlay what is, in effect, a 2nd election (by mail) that has to be reconciled with what happens at the polls … this is very high risk …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
10/12 … this “2 concurrent elections” risk was a primary argument for all elections being conducted by mail in Oregon, which was adopted after 20 years of practice with dual polling/mail elections—practice that none of these states whose elections are in question have had …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
11/12 Observers were not allowed during the original count or the recount. There is no defense for this and intrinsically implies that elections officials had something to hide …
Rick Hanson
@visionfarm
·
Nov 26
12/12 There are other things to pick on, but these I cannot think of a way to defend and probably are sufficient to meet the apparent (according to the lawsuit) standard of “preponderance of the evidence” to “doubt the result.” Eager to read defendants’ response!

https://twitter.com/visionfarm/status/1332151342811340802